When faith seeks understanding—when belief is grounded in revelation and open to the light of reason—truth can travel.
If fideism is your epistemology, then geography and not theology determines what you believe. If you’re born in Riyadh, you’re likely a Muslim. If you’re born in Kentucky, you’re likely a Christian. If you’re born in Uttar Pradesh, you’re likely a Hindu. Culture shapes conviction. Geography shapes belief. Every honest theologian or apologist must face that uncomfortable fact. Yet the problem runs deeper than sociology. It is epistemological—the question of how we know what we know. And that’s where fideism comes in.
Fideism teaches that faith alone—that is, faith separate from any reason or evidence—is the foundation of all religious truth. The fideist believes because he believes. In mild form, fideism says faith is independent of reason. In its stronger form, it claims reason is hostile to faith, that any attempt to justify belief is an act of unbelief.
It sounds pious, even humble: “I don’t need evidence; I have faith.” But here’s the hidden cost: when faith is divorced from reason, the content of faith no longer matters. The only thing that matters is that you believe something intensely.
Once faith is detached from reason, truth becomes local. If faith depends only on what one is taught to believe, then truth depends on who taught you.
Fideism defends the tribe, not the truth.
A Muslim who trusts the Qur’an simply because “that’s what I’ve always believed” is exercising the same epistemology as a Christian who insists, “The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it.” Both are sincere. Both are certain. Both believe because they were raised to.
If that’s the measure of truth, then faith is not about revelation but about heritage. Fideism defends the tribe, not the truth.
Islamic thought has long wrestled with the tension between faith and reason. Famous medieval Islamic philosophers like Avicenna and Averroes sought to harmonize revelation and philosophy. Their work would even influence Christian scholastic thinkers like Thomas Aquinas. But some, like the influential orthodox Muslim theologian al-Ghazali, moved in the opposite direction.
For al-Ghazali, human reason was too frail to comprehend God. The Qur’an was true because God said so, not because its truth could be demonstrated. Philosophy was dangerous precisely because it presumed to judge revelation.
In that epistemology, submission to the tradition handed down replaces understanding. The believer’s role is not to examine or explore but to obey. Faith becomes a matter of inheritance. You are born Muslim; that is enough.
Something strikingly similar can happen inside Christianity—particularly in certain strands of modern fundamentalism. Consider a ministry like Answers in Genesis. It insists that the authority of Scripture depends entirely on a literal, six-day creation. Any appeal to evidence, genre, or context is treated as unbelief. Reason is not a tool for understanding; it’s a threat to be silenced.
From Augustine to Aquinas to the Lutheran scholastics, the Church has insisted that reason is not an enemy of faith but its servant.
This is not the faith of the Reformation. The Reformers rejected rationalism, but never promoted irrationalism. Luther called reason “the devil’s whore” when it exalted itself above the Word of God, but he also called it “the greatest gift of God” when it served the Word. From Augustine to Aquinas to the Lutheran scholastics, the Church has insisted that reason is not an enemy of faith but its servant. The Reformers believed that faith is above reason, not against it.
Modern fideism collapses that distinction. It replaces theology with reflex. And once again, belief becomes a product of birthplace more than revelation.
Ironically, fideism and relativism are siblings. The fideist says, “My beliefs are true because I believe.” The relativist says, “Your beliefs are true for you because you believe.” Both remove truth from evidence. Both make conviction psychological instead of theological.
When truth no longer appeals to reason, it becomes captive to culture. Religion turns into anthropology. Faith becomes sociology. Whether the creed says “God is one” or “God is triune” depends not on revelation, but on your postal code.
Revelation does not destroy reason; it redeems it.
Christianity has always insisted that faith is reasonable. Paul appealed to evidence—the risen Christ seen by “more than five hundred” (1 Cor. 15). Luke praised the Bereans for testing the Christian message (Acts 17:11). Peter commanded believers to be ready to give a reason for their hope (1 Peter 3:15).
That is not fideism. That is reason illuminated by revelation. Faith does not replace understanding; it deepens it. Revelation does not destroy reason; it redeems it. To abandon reason is not to become spiritual—it is to become provincial.
In an age when both Islam and fundamentalist Christianity appeal to “faith alone” as a way of knowing, we need to recover the classical Christian view: that faith and reason belong together because both are gifts of God.
If fideism defines your epistemology, your beliefs are determined mostly by accident of birth. A Muslim fideist and a Christian fideist share the same method; they only differ in geography. But when faith seeks understanding—when belief is grounded in revelation and open to the light of reason—truth can travel. It can cross borders. It can persuade and change minds. Christianity does not fear inquiry because the God who calls us to faith is the same God who made our minds.
The Christian tradition has never held that faith is the opposite of reason. Rather, it teaches something even more profound. In the words of Augustine, Christianity says, “Believe so that you may understand.” For Augustine and the Christian tradition, faith and reason are not adversaries but companions—reason finding its fulfillment in the light of faith. Fideism forgets this and, in doing so, trades the universality of the gospel for the smallness of the village.
.webp?width=36&height=36&name=1517headshots-141-Edit%20(1).webp){kind=small}
